Emily Sartz-Lunde vs Severine Deppner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Aug at 11:11 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Sartz-Lunde vs S. Deppner

NOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sartz-Lunde 1 - 0 Deppner
They have played 2 sets in total, with Emily Sartz-Lunde winning 2 and Severine Deppner winning 0. The last match between Emily Sartz-Lunde and Severine Deppner was at the W15 Monastir, 12-08-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Emily Sartz-Lunde getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sartz-Lunde | 1 |
| Deppner | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W15 Monastir(08-12-25)
E. Sartz-Lunde vs S. Deppner H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.25% (18-14) | Career Total W/L | 43.75% (35-45) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Sartz-Lunde vs S. Deppner Match Preview:
- Second serve performance shows that Deppner wins 39.3% of points compared to Sartz-Lunde's 31.06%. Could this be a decisive factor in the match? Perhaps, as there's a strong link between second serve stats and match outcomes.
- In returning their opponent's second serves, Sartz-Lunde edges slightly ahead with 55.71% versus Deppner's 55.05% success rate.
- When facing first serves, Deppner outperforms with 37.12% return success compared to Sartz-Lunde's 32.38%.
- Under pressure conditions, Deppner proves slightly more resilient, saving 45.54% of breakpoints, while Sartz-Lunde manages 43.33%.
- Overall match wins in the last year favor Sartz-Lunde at 68.75%, whereas Deppner has secured 43.75% of victories.
- On hard surfaces, Sartz-Lunde has a significant advantage with a 75% win rate compared to Deppner's 53%.
- In lower-tier events, Sartz-Lunde excels with a 76.92% win rate, while Deppner's win rate is 51.85%.
- The quality of opponents played highlights that Deppner faced players with an average rank of 257.63, higher than Sartz-Lunde's 436.06.
- In deciding sets, Sartz-Lunde has a slight edge, winning 75% compared to Deppner’s 71%.
- Recently, Sartz-Lunde has been more effective at converting breakpoints, achieving 48.15% success vs. Deppner's 46.15%.
Editorial Prediction (August 12, 2025, UTC):
Assessing the key statistics, both Sartz-Lunde and Deppner display unique strengths. Deppner's superior second serve performance may give them an edge, and their better breakpoint saving under pressure could be critical.
However, Sartz-Lunde's ability to convert breakpoints more efficiently and their overall higher match win percentage, especially on hard courts, cannot be overlooked.
While Deppner has faced tougher competition, Sartz-Lunde's consistent success in lower-tier events suggests a strong baseline performance.
Given the evaluation of these factors, Sartz-Lunde appears to have a marginal edge and is the likely winner of the upcoming match.
Emily Sartz-Lunde vs Severine Deppner Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Sartz-Lunde vs S. Deppner H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:58:43 | Average Match Time | 0:58:43 |
| 66% (25/38) | 1st Serve % | 71% (27/38) |
| 80% (20/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 33% (9/27) |
| 62% (8/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 18% (2/11) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/3) |
| 71% (27/38) | Return Points Win % | 26% (10/38) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Sartz-Lunde Recent Matches Played
S. Deppner Recent Matches Played

E. Sartz-Lunde vs S. Deppner Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.25% (18/14) | YTD Win/Loss | 43.75% (35/45) |
| 54.05% (40/34) | Sets Win/Loss | 41.67% (75/105) |
| 51.64% (346/324) | Games Win/Loss | 47.61% (808/889) |
| 71.43% (10/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.22% (21/20) |
| 44.44% (8/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (6/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.10% (8/13) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 32 | Aces Total | 5 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 95 | Total Double Faults | 227 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:10:12 |
| 457.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 267.69 |
| 60% (670/1124) | 1st Serve % | 73% (2791/3849) |
| 62% (414/670) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (1470/2791) |
| 41% (186/454) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (425/1058) |
| 51% (82/162) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (222/443) |
| 48% (565/1170) | Return Points Win % | 46% (1709/3698) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Challenger W/L | 21.43% (3/11) |
| 64.00% (16/9) | Futures W/L | 49.23% (32/33) |
| 56% (18/32) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (35/80) |
| 75% (3/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 22% (2/9) |
| 60% (6/10) | Deciding Set Win % | 75% (15/20) |
| 85% (20/17) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (28/24) |
| 15% (20/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (28/4) |
| 8% (12/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (52/11) |